Trust review brief
Braillia Security and Privacy Review Overview
A public overview of the security, privacy, data handling, access, retention, and implementation topics an authorized review should examine.
- For
- Security, privacy, IT, risk, procurement
- Decision this supports
- What must our reviewers validate for the proposed workflow?
- Format
- 7 minute read
01
Review the actual data path
Braillia must process readable content to remediate, structure, transform, and deliver accessible information. The review should follow the specific source, sensitivity, systems, users, outputs, and retention needs of the proposed workflow.
Data classification and movement
Identify what enters the workflow, where it is processed, which outputs are produced, where they are delivered, and which data classes are prohibited or require additional approval.
Identity and access
Review organization roles, least-privilege access, administrative boundaries, approved domains, signed access, and user delivery controls relevant to the implementation.
Protection and operations
Review TLS in transit, encryption at rest, private network and storage controls, malware safety, secrets management, monitoring, and auditability topics.
Retention and governance
Define retention expectations, deletion responsibilities, lifecycle rules, evidence needs, incident processes, and applicable organizational policies.
02
Questions for an authorized security review
- What information and data classifications will the scoped workflow process?
- Which Braillia services, customer systems, integrations, and user access paths are involved?
- Which roles can submit, review, administer, deliver, or retrieve information?
- What retention, deletion, logging, backup, and audit evidence does the workflow require?
- Are HIPAA, BAA, PHI, GDPR, or other policy requirements in scope?
- Which customer and Braillia teams own approval, configuration, monitoring, and incident coordination?
03